2nd testimony was a piece of cake, but I am now stuck at proving what Gaine's testimony changes...
EDIT: There's an almost game-breaking bug!
Spoiler : :
There are two Scarlet Profiles and only one of them works for this contradiction. Well... maybe game-breaking is a bit of an exaggeration, but it sure caused me trouble!
_________________ Formerly bjc72.
Fri Jul 29, 2011 4:39 am
Tap
Moderator
Joined: Tue Dec 15, 2009 9:01 am Posts: 4286 Location: Melbourne, Australia
Gender: Male
Spoken languages: English, 日本語
got past the first one, with some help. Ah, glad you got past it. It really wasn't that obvious, to me at least. I kept trying to show contradictions involving the people in the room I think I told you a long time ago I wasn't good with time contradictions. I think an hour on the first testimony (only getting it after a couple of hints) is proof of that. Hmm... maybe I underestimated the difficulty of the contradiction. Then again, I thought Oldbag's testimonies in Part 3 were quite easy, so maybe you should trust my judgement.
mAc Chaos: That sounds fantastic! If it works, then we'll be able to tick off another box for reasons why you should use Safe Mode.
Holhol1235: Sappy dialogue sounds like you hit the Klavier scenes. They're my favourite. I love writing one sided Klavier/Apollo~
oyeah1988: You're miles ahead of everyone! Blackrune has some serious competition now.
bjc72:
bjc72 wrote:
Spoiler : :
2nd testimony was a piece of cake, but I am now stuck at proving what Gaine's testimony changes... I'll give you a clue. It's not the location or the time. ^^
EDIT: There's an almost game-breaking bug!
Spoiler : :
There are two Scarlet Profiles and only one of them works for this contradiction. Well... maybe game-breaking is a bit of an exaggeration, but it sure caused me trouble! Did you use avancement at all? I'm positive that the other profile is hidden until it is properly revealed later on...
_________________
Fri Jul 29, 2011 5:25 am
oyeah1988
Joined: Mon Jun 30, 2008 2:10 am Posts: 27 Location: At home?
Gender: Male
Spoken languages: English
Actually tap, I just finished. In short, it was incredible. I honestly didn't think this case could compete with Turnabout Substitution, but today, you have proven me wrong. I am gonna wait a couple of days for more people to finish, then I will post my mini-review. God, that was amazing!
_________________
Fri Jul 29, 2011 5:32 am
AquaAce72
Joined: Sat May 08, 2010 6:20 am Posts: 217 Location: Both.
Gender: Male
Spoken languages: English, un poco Español
No type of advancement whatsoever. I don't even know how to do that I've refreshed the page and saved multiple times since I've began playing and both of the profiles were there the entire time, so I don't think it's a loading error...
Also, stuck on 3rd testimony now.
EDIT: Absolutely no clue on 3rd testimony... is everyone else somehow cheating, or do I just really suck at this?
_________________ Formerly bjc72.
Fri Jul 29, 2011 5:32 am
Tap
Moderator
Joined: Tue Dec 15, 2009 9:01 am Posts: 4286 Location: Melbourne, Australia
Gender: Male
Spoken languages: English, 日本語
Actually tap, I just finished. In short, it was incredible. I honestly didn't think this case could compete with Turnabout Substitution, but today, you have proven me wrong. I am gonna wait a couple of days for more people to finish, then I will post my mini-review. God, that was amazing!
I... I have? But... I don't think this case is on Sub level. I can't wait to read it then. Thank you for playing, and I'm glad you enjoyed it. I had a blast making this episode.
Quote:
EDIT: Absolutely no clue on 3rd testimony... is everyone else somehow cheating, or do I just really suck at this?
I'll send you a PM.
_________________
Fri Jul 29, 2011 6:16 am
Blackrune
Joined: Fri Apr 17, 2009 3:11 am Posts: 2920 Location: Right behind you
Spoken languages: English, German, Japanese
1st Testimony: It was a perfectly legit contradiction which should have been obvious, but since the focus of the testimony was actually on something else it wasn't that easy to spot ^^'
2nd Testimony: I think it was pretty obvious. Same piece of evidence, just a little more obvious this time. XD
---thing inbetween---> Alright I didn't really know what to do for a few seconds but that his lies changed the time or the scene really wouldn't have made that much sense, so I just guessed the most likely culprits.
3rd Testimony: Not too difficult, just the fact... that you have to be too darned precise again. What do you mean it doesn't count if I present the master Key on the statement where she mentions that she went to get the key? What do you mean that does only imply that she was planning to get it but hasn't said that she's actually gotten it yet. The actual 'getting' is hidden inbetween the statements? It's perfectly legit but I still hate you for this.... and myself for falling for this.
---Ok WHY is Apollo getting away with claiming "No, I already found that key when the door was still alright." Why does NOBODY even suggest he's making that up just to have a case against someone else? He's the DEFENDANT why is his testimony suddenly considered trustworthy!?
4th Testimony: This was a mess. So many things that could be contradictions. How did the defendant lock the room if she'd seen him there, already unconscious? He woke up again, locked the door and fell unconscious again or what? The hell? I really wanted this to be the contradiction, but NO it had to be "lolz you couldn't have known about the wiped prints".
5th Testimony: ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... O_o Should I feel honoured that I am the cause of these ridiculous testimonies? Should I be happy about the fact that I somewhat indirectly contributed to how this case turned out? Well I most certainly do feel somewhat honoured, BUT THIS IS TOO HARD DANGIT. X_x The card? THE CARD? I got the other two right, I used them together with profiles, more profiles, and everything... just to get Portsroll'd every time!? >_< I actually came up with this ungodly feature while playing some strange point&click game in which you had to come up with the correct deductions here and then. Basically there were a bunch of questions and you had the match the pieces of information you received with each question. You just didn't know how many pieces you needed for each question, and if you even got one wrong it wouldn't even tell you which questions you got right and which you got wrong. THERE WERE WAY TOO MANY POSSIBILITIES! >.<
Fine, at least that was- WHATDOYOUMEANITSSTILLNOTOVER!?
---Hehe, needed only 3 tries for this one. I remember each one, though I'm sure they wouldn't make any sense to you. First attempt: 'Call a witness' -> Oldbag ....don't ask. But i assure you I was serious when I proposed this. Second attempt: Search teh basement.... I guess I didn't really think this one through, but I corrected my mistake on the third try.
Ok, quite the ni- YOUGOTTABEKIDDINGMETHERESSTILLMOREIHAVETODO!? .... okay, somehow work things out with those two pieces.... another hidden clue in the recording? I sorta think that's what you want us to assume.... I got it right on the first try. AND OLDBAG WAS ACTUALLY USEFUL IN THE END I KNEW IT!
What.... emotional approach? I'm bad with this... *15 tries later* Told ya I suck at this, even though it should have been obvious lol. ... ... THE ACE? NO WHY? This is a creepy coincidence again... just wait for my 4th case. Creeeeepy coincidences, I assure you all of this had been already planned before you released this case. ... ... >.> O.o EVIL ending. EEEEEEEVIIIL ENDING! XD I like it.
What's there to say? This is a masterpiece. The whole case is a thrilling experience with unexpected twist everywhere. Eventually you don't even know what to believe anymorre. It's difficult. It's ridiculously difficult, but has a very rewarding plot if you managed to get past all those traps. The investigations are exciting and creative. And they have quite the atmosphere, I think in retrospect I actually like the investigations here at least as much as the trials, if not even more. (and I usually hate investigations) During the trials, you have the feeling of being screwed all the time... the first one still scares me. D: The least the final one was at least a little bit more human-friendly again. This ranks up high in my list of fancases. You can be proud of yourself. Let's celebrate the completion of one of the best and without a doubt the longest fantrials up to date.
And one final thing I need to address... I'm not sure if you expected this, but...
Spoiler : part 7 :
Blackrune wrote:
And who "came in" right after them? Scarlet Hall!
Posted on the 23th of December 2010 as part of a big theory based only on the facts I had at that time... I'm amazed by my past self, all the new stuff after that led me off-track and ruined my clear view on this. I basically knew exactly what was going on back then.
Damn, I really can't believe it's here, it's so surreal.
I'm just taking a minute to remember the entire history of JM, far before it became what it is today. I remember when the very first version of the 300-frame TSD came out and just being baffled at how such a terrible and short case could be featured: Hell, I have to be honest, when I played that thing, I had no faith in Tap OR JM to produce quality. Then came the PyWright version of TSD: Which was a massive improvement, and something that could actually qualify as a case. (And before the TSD-hating project head jumps on me, I said it qualifies as a case, not as a good one ) and that large jump in quality really got me hooked onto the project and made me think it had some very real potential. But then progress kinda died down for a bit.
Then progress was revived on AAO, and I remember getting Tap on MSN and talking to him about JM for a bit, just to ask him if this was going to be the last version of TSD. His response was something like "I'm tired of writing dialogue for these characters, this is it. Besides, I really want to work on this next case, I've had the idea for so long." And, finally, that case has surpassed the idea stage. It's here, available to all of us, as a full case. It's longer than Scapegoat and Substitution and could very arguably be better (I'm not chipping in until I finish this).
And just to think the difference in quality that the series, not just the first case, has gone through as a whole... we've gone from opening with a 300-frame filler case and a bunch of other filler cases before getting to Sirens, the grand finale, to OPENING with Sirens, a massive 20k frame or whatever brilliant first case with a plot that continues on through three other cases that will undoubtedly be excellent. If I didn't know better, I'd almost think the JM from 2 years ago isn't the JM we see today. But perhaps the JM from 2 years ago isn't the JM we have today: This marks the beginning of something special. Everybody remember Remnants of the Past? That thing everybody thought was going to be amazing? Forget Remnants of the Past. THIS is Remnants of the Past. It's everything people wanted ROTP to be, but the most important thing is that it exists, and it lives up to everybody's expectations.
...I'm gonna shut up and play now. XD Commentary may be a bit smudged, I just woke up and I have a tendency to get really sucked into things...
_________________
Engaged to Gumpei <3
Bad Player wrote:
Yes, that's exactly correct. The purpose of the test is to test whether you have an understanding of the material, not if you've simply memorized it and can regurgitate it. In fact, I'm sure the reason he put the 'trick questions' on the test was in order to see who understood the material and was paying attention and who was simply memorizing facts without taking the time and effort to actually understand them.
Last edited by SwagmaWampyr on Fri Jul 29, 2011 2:15 pm, edited 4 times in total.
Fri Jul 29, 2011 10:35 am
Tap
Moderator
Joined: Tue Dec 15, 2009 9:01 am Posts: 4286 Location: Melbourne, Australia
Gender: Male
Spoken languages: English, 日本語
And the first 'official' report is in, and surprise surprise, it's Rune! You always finish first, which is great. It shows how absorbed you were into the trial.
Blackrune wrote:
Finished~ Replies are in red.
Spoiler : part 7 :
1st Testimony: It was a perfectly legit contradiction which should have been obvious, but since the focus of the testimony was actually on something else it wasn't that easy to spot ^^' I think what also distracted the player was that it was the first statement, and usually, the contradiction always lies on the fourth or later statements. I'm glad that this one worked out quite well.
2nd Testimony: I think it was pretty obvious. Same piece of evidence, just a little more obvious this time. XD In terms of the testimony and the relevance of the contradiction, then it's definitely the easiest. It still might trip up a few people, though...
---thing inbetween---> Alright I didn't really know what to do for a few seconds but that his lies changed the time or the scene really wouldn't have made that much sense, so I just guessed the most likely culprits. Right, well the time of the crime is briefly covered over in the interlude between T1 & T2. If you choose "I can prove it", there's an opportunity to present the Crime Report, which talks about a change in the time of the crime, but Ballard overrules the objection pretty quickly. I don't think I covered scenario, so the only other option left is the attacker's identity.
3rd Testimony: Not too difficult, just the fact... that you have to be too darned precise again. What do you mean it doesn't count if I present the master Key on the statement where she mentions that she went to get the key? What do you mean that does only imply that she was planning to get it but hasn't said that she's actually gotten it yet. The actual 'getting' is hidden inbetween the statements? It's perfectly legit but I still hate you for this.... and myself for falling for this. Aha! I was hoping someone would get caught on this. I deliberately worded the contradictory statement to be incredibly vague. It suggests she did retrieve it, but I thought that players would try and prove that she couldn't have it in the previous statement. I smiled when I read it. Sorry, Rune!
---Ok WHY is Apollo getting away with claiming "No, I already found that key when the door was still alright." Why does NOBODY even suggest he's making that up just to have a case against someone else? He's the DEFENDANT why is his testimony suddenly considered trustworthy!? Ur... ah... well... remember the case of Apollo's guilt is built upon possibilities, and it isn't all that decisive. The only reason the jurors chose to vote guilty was because Apollo's argument against the bellboy lost standing when the evidence to tie it all together was stricken from the record. Edgeworth has also been trying to continue proceedings even to the point of stopping a verdict which would be in favour of his case. Ballard read the situation, and allowed the claims to go through.
4th Testimony: This was a mess. So many things that could be contradictions. How did the defendant lock the room if she'd seen him there, already unconscious? He woke up again, locked the door and fell unconscious again or what? The hell? I really wanted this to be the contradiction, but NO it had to be "lolz you couldn't have known about the wiped prints". Didn't I explain it? The door would've still been locked from the inside manually even though Scarlet was able to get into the room using the electronic lock. I think I might have left this out... I recall about a week and a half ago thinking that it was already implied heavily enough, and it'd be redundant to mention it again.
Sorry about the contradiction. I had no ideas when I wrote the overview of what to do, but Ping' explained that I needed to find something to bring the forward. As Scarlet had admitted to having entered the victim's room more than once, this gave her the opportunity to tamper with the scene. The contradiction had to be a mistake she made in describing the crime scene, hence the lack of fingerprints on the knife.
5th Testimony: ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... O_o Should I feel honoured that I am the cause of these ridiculous testimonies? Should I be happy about the fact that I somewhat indirectly contributed to how this case turned out? Well I most certainly do feel somewhat honoured, BUT THIS IS TOO HARD DANGIT. X_x The card? THE CARD? I got the other two right, I used them together with profiles, more profiles, and everything... just to get Portsroll'd every time!? >_< You know, you should really blame Ping' since he's the one who wants the gimmick to become a part of every fangame out there...
Heh, well I knew it'd be hard, but I thought I gave away enough clues. I even added in a frame in the co-counsel conversation about why Scarlet was insistent on seeing De Killer. That should've been the clue the calling card was one part to it. If you remember back when you spoke with her in Investigation ~ Night, she mentioned her contempt for De Killer...
I actually came up with this ungodly feature while playing some strange point&click game in which you had to come up with the correct deductions here and then. Basically there were a bunch of questions and you had the match the pieces of information you received with each question. You just didn't know how many pieces you needed for each question, and if you even got one wrong it wouldn't even tell you which questions you got right and which you got wrong. THERE WERE WAY TOO MANY POSSIBILITIES! >.< I see. It's interesting to read the history behind the feature. That's what I like about it - there are so many possibilities that you can trip the player up on. ^^
Fine, at least that was- WHATDOYOUMEANITSSTILLNOTOVER!? Do you think I'd let it end that early?
---Hehe, needed only 3 tries for this one. I remember each one, though I'm sure they wouldn't make any sense to you. First attempt: 'Call a witness' -> Oldbag ....don't ask. But i assure you I was serious when I proposed this. Fun Fact: Oldbag was meant to testify in Part 7, but I uhm, used her contradiction in Part 6, so her appearance would've been redundant... Second attempt: Search teh basement.... I guess I didn't really think this one through, but I corrected my mistake on the third try. Why the basement?
Ok, quite the ni- YOUGOTTABEKIDDINGMETHERESSTILLMOREIHAVETODO!? Do you think I'd let it end this early?
.... okay, somehow work things out with those two pieces.... another hidden clue in the recording? I sorta think that's what you want us to assume.... It's always nice making the player choose what to do. I made sure that every possible option was given sufficient dialogue to convince the player to pursue that option instead.
I got it right on the first try. AND OLDBAG WAS ACTUALLY USEFUL IN THE END I KNEW IT! It's ironical, isn't it? Her testimony was actually good for once... ^^
What.... emotional approach? I'm bad with this... *15 tries later* Told ya I suck at this, even though it should have been obvious lol. Really? Well, you're not going to like my future trials then. JM has been inspired by Greek tragedy, and emotional approaches are heavy in those, as you might know...
... ... THE ACE? NO WHY? This is a creepy coincidence again... just wait for my 4th case. Creeeeepy coincidences, I assure you all of this had been already planned before you released this case. Haha, no problem. I've had the whole Ace issue planned for a while now myself. It seems great minds think alike after all. First there was the fake unlimited penalty, and now this... xD
... ... >.> O.o EVIL ending. EEEEEEEVIIIL ENDING! XD I like it. Here comes the question: Did Thalassa die, or was she resuscitated by staff on call?
What's there to say? This is a masterpiece. The whole case is a thrilling experience with unexpected twist everywhere. Eventually you don't even know what to believe anymorre. It's difficult. It's ridiculously difficult, but has a very rewarding plot if you managed to get past all those traps. The investigations are exciting and creative. And they have quite the atmosphere, I think in retrospect I actually like the investigations here at least as much as the trials, if not even more. (and I usually hate investigations) Thank you very much for your compliments! Sirens was designed to be the ultimate case I wanted to make. It had everything I wanted in it - from the player having to defend themselves (à la 1-2) to the unexpected twists at every single point. The hard part when I was developing the case was having to wait until Night before the counterfeiting syndicate made themselves known. I really wanted to introduce them earlier, but I think it was better to keep their presence hidden until that time. I think it worked out better.
I'm glad to hear that. I don't like investigations myself, but I'll try and keep the same sort of "likeable" atmosphere in the future. I've got some crazy plans for Departed's investigations, but you won't see any word of that until the end of the year.
During the trials, you have the feeling of being screwed all the time... the first one still scares me. D: The least the final one was at least a little bit more human-friendly again. I think the first one tripped everyone. No one really expected I was going to make it that hard. To think that at the time, I thought it was really, really easy. It's strange how things like that work out, no?
This ranks up high in my list of fancases. You can be proud of yourself. Let's celebrate the completion of one of the best and without a doubt the longest fantrials up to date. Thank you again! I'm really, really, really pleased to hear that it ranks up high. My aim was to achieve a trial of quality similar to Scapegoat and Substitution. I think I'll achieve that when Departed is complete.
And one final thing I need to address... I'm not sure if you expected this, but... Alright, let's see...
Spoiler : part 7 :
Blackrune wrote:
And who "came in" right after them? Scarlet Hall!
Posted on the 23th of December 2010 as part of a big theory based only on the facts I had at that time... I'm amazed by my past self, all the new stuff after that led me off-track and ruined my clear view on this. I basically knew exactly what was going on back then. Yes, Ping' and I laughed on MSN back when you posted your theory. Actually, several parts of the theory were also correct. There was going to be a secret passage hidden in the ceiling (as a result of the renovations), but that plot point was removed in favour of having the player focus on the Bellboy's guilt.
Thanks again for playing, Rune! I'm really happy you've enjoyed Sirens. Let's hope you replay it in the future for who knows why. I'd say stay tuned for Departed, but uhm, Departed 2-1 won't be out until late December...
bjc72: Thanks for playing! I look forward to reading a review... that is, if you write one at a later date. As for what's in the spoiler tag, well... all I can say is that now you have a question to ask yourself. Check Rune's review for it.
BBblader: Oh, wow... I don't even know where to begin. Maybe a big "thank you" will work. ^^ You've put a really big smile on my face after I read all of it. I'm blushing a bit from embarrassment at your mentions of TSD, but even I have to admit it:
TSD was fundamental to the evolution of JM and Sirens. Without it, this case would have never existed in this shape and form today. Despite how much I hate it since all the forms of it have been quite pathetic, it was still a stepping stone that I needed to take in order to make this journey. In fact, I have Unas, and the community to thank as well. I started to become more involved in the community after I was promoted to moderator of the art section. I began to experiment with the editor again, and soon enough, I decided to make the decision to work on the revamp here. So thank you everyone for showing your support in my ability to moderate a sub-forum. If it wasn't for you, JM wouldn't have been this well-received!
I could write a couple of pages in reply to that post, so I'll sum it up here. I'm going to put a link to your post in the first thread since I believe it is something everyone should read. It's a beautiful post, and it sums up exactly what JM has been through since its beginning
_________________
Fri Jul 29, 2011 11:29 am
SwagmaWampyr
Joined: Thu Apr 16, 2009 2:15 pm Posts: 6273 Location: The mucky muck castle made of clouds
Gender: Male
Spoken languages: English, Basic 1337
We briefly interrupt this commentary to bring you a special bulletin message:
CE5 IS BLOODY SADISTIC HEAAAAAALLLLLPPPPP!!!!! D:
Spoiler : Said CE5 :
I think I have a few building blocks here, the 2016 Files and the UI-4 report. Both of those are definitely important somehow. However, I don't think I'm going to get anywhere just with those two pieces, and I'm not sure where to present them in the testimony... there's two possible key statements here: "The truth is that I had no qualms with Thalassa Gramarye, so bye- bye Mr. Non-Existent Motive.", and "Also, I had no idea of the victim's true identity until it came to light a couple of days ago." So, yeah, I seriously need help.
_________________
Engaged to Gumpei <3
Bad Player wrote:
Yes, that's exactly correct. The purpose of the test is to test whether you have an understanding of the material, not if you've simply memorized it and can regurgitate it. In fact, I'm sure the reason he put the 'trick questions' on the test was in order to see who understood the material and was paying attention and who was simply memorizing facts without taking the time and effort to actually understand them.
Fri Jul 29, 2011 12:49 pm
Ping'
Joined: Tue Dec 30, 2008 12:23 pm Posts: 795 Location: Paris
Gender: Male
Spoken languages: Français, English, Español
Made even more ridiculous by the fact that I already know what you're meant to prove and how you're meant to prove it... That, and I'm the reason there's a super-present in there in the first place! (For some reason, I can picture Blackrune laughing his head off right now :p That'll teach me.) Penalty conversation is awwwwwsum (I came to play! etc.) though.
4th Testimony: This was a mess. So many things that could be contradictions. How did the defendant lock the room if she'd seen him there, already unconscious? He woke up again, locked the door and fell unconscious again or what? The hell? I really wanted this to be the contradiction, but NO it had to be "lolz you couldn't have known about the wiped prints". Didn't I explain it? The door would've still been locked from the inside manually even though Scarlet was able to get into the room using the electronic lock. I think I might have left this out... I recall about a week and a half ago thinking that it was already implied heavily enough, and it'd be redundant to mention it again.
Right... that's what I assumed for some reason, so maybe it has already been implied somewhere. I think Apollo even mentioned it again, so blame this on me for ignoring vital details here. ^^"
Hm, I'm just catching onto Gaines's whole "Shakespearean speech" character gimmick, and it's really a lot of fun XD
"What do you mean by half-seven?" Oh come ON Polly...
"Overgrown strudel head"? Hm, perhaps Tap doesn't hate TSD as much as he would have us believe? XD
Wait, why did I just now realize that Artie has the famous Krump hand sprite? Even more proof that they're the same person...
Bah, the problem here is REALLY obvious, I just don't know how to point it out... >_>
oh wait, that's not it...
Uh... damn... what, then?
Hey hey Edgey easy easy we're going to need Artie >_>
...Urgh, how DO you prove something like that?
Hah, I had a feeling you shouldn't try when I saw the target frame on "I can't prove it" :3
I see a grand total of nothing wrong about this testimony. Of course I saw nothing wrong with the first testimony either until I had it pointed out to me... please don't let this be another Oldbag press-fest... >_>_>_>
...Uh oh, Artie's starting to scare me...
....We're doomed. >_> Or not, come to think of it... all this means is that the Bellboy didn't carry out the attack, something I thought was unlikely to begin with... so this isn't so bad.
TEEEEEEN POIIIIIIIINTS TOOO EDGGEEEWOOORRRTH!
Oh wow, going right into the big accusation... Hmm...
Not Ballard, but I never brought into it being him anyway...
I BELIEVED IN SCARLET'S INNOCENCE FROM DAY ONE AND THIS IS HOW SHE REPAYS ME.
Lady Justice. Lawl.
And I'm going to be exposing Scarlet once and for all. Boy, if only Chaos was here to see this...
...Of course, easier said than done, right? Not giving up just yet though...
Playing this all at once would have been so much easier, I'm forgetting so many key details that have been clearly stated... >_>
Getting closer... 4th CE.
And presto... has it been 3000~ frames already? No, this is just Tap messing with us, I'm sure...
"Objection overruled. Even a glass cannon wouldn't be as foolish to object to their own motion."
...I feel cheated, the one time I come up with what seems like a legitimate explanation it's something else... D: But anyway, how's she going to squirm out of this one...?
Yep, I KNEW we had at least one more CE in the bag...
...And I also kind of expected her to play the motive card, since there isn't much else she can do at this point.
SUPER OBJECTION YOU HAVE TO BE KIDDING ME.
Oh well, I wanna see Portsman... so let's fail it on purpose!
...Cocky... XDXD
...And there's the obligatory Princeton line
...Urgh... where do I even begin...
Finally through it... and Scarlet's out of places to hide.
...Oh just give it up already... nobody's fooled anymore.
There's an easy way to do this, and there's a hard way to do this... why she would just be able to switch clothes is easy enough, but I actually have to PROVE she was wearing yellow... >_>
Luckily, I think I've caught on... Oldbag has saved the day!
...wait what the perfect opportunity for Tap to troll us all by bringing up Windbag and he misses it? D: No wait, maybe it was...
...No...? Oldbag doesn't work either...? Is this some sophisticated form of reverse-trolling? Meh, let's see what sweeping the scene gets us, although I just KNOW Tap has employed the "Scapegoat-trap" technique before I did...
Oh no, not quite...
Lovely picture of Scarlet wearing the uniform.
Okay Scarlet, weasel out of this one!
NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! I went to the youtube link through the trial because I hit "open link" accidentally!!!! D: D: D: D: D: Tap's getting me an advancement but MAN....
Man, she's ranking up here with Alba and the Bellboy...and a certain someone from TDG Part 2 whose name I almost don't feel like I should exclude simply because it's so obvious.
Okay, NOW does Oldbag's Testimony save the day?
Finally...
O_O the scream scared me but in retrospect it's funny just seeing her stand there in the court overview XD
KLAVIER LOL
Oh wow Trucy's crying sprite, that's great
(And there goes a great Kodak moment, all thanks to the idiot known as Klavler Gavin.) QFT.
And there's the big MEAA connection, right?
(OH WOW I HOVERED DANGEROUSLY CLOSE TO THE LITTLE GREY X IN THE OPEN TAB HERE LEMME JUST HIT SUBMIT SO I HAVE EVERYTHING SAVED THAT WAS JUST TOO CLOSE TO CALL O_O)
TACO DELL!!!!
(Although I heard recently that he [Payne] actually won a trial, so maybe he's being seriously considered.) WHAT. :O :O :O
This... this is... too much. I don't even know if I can finish...
..Wow... actually seeing my name there in the credits of the game itself... it's the most amazing feeling. I don't even care that I didn't contribute all that much scriptwriting to the actual game. Just seeing my name there, in the credits of one of the most legendary games there is... it's the most amazing feeling, it really is.
...Thalassa flatlined D: D: D: And after such a triumph, that's just about the biggest buzzkill I've ever witnessed. I'll be feeling like crap all day now.
...I... I seriously don't know what to say except "Wow and damn." I seriously don't know if I can say this is the best fangame ever even though it is a very damn good contender. I just... I just can't say anything.
EXCEPT PLAY THIS ENTIRE CASE ALL THE WAY THROUGH IF FOR SOME REASON YOU HAVEN'T ALREADY. RIGHT. NOW.
_________________
Engaged to Gumpei <3
Bad Player wrote:
Yes, that's exactly correct. The purpose of the test is to test whether you have an understanding of the material, not if you've simply memorized it and can regurgitate it. In fact, I'm sure the reason he put the 'trick questions' on the test was in order to see who understood the material and was paying attention and who was simply memorizing facts without taking the time and effort to actually understand them.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
(
It's perfectly legit but I still hate you for this.... and myself for falling for this.
So that means I can play it without having to wait?
